Science & Religion

Scientific Models and Religious mythsThe common notion is that science describes the macrocosm as it is , while religion essential use confirmatory methods to describe transcendental truth because it is beyond the parts human cod . However , a proper examination of the situation reveals that the expose of science to descriptive exactitude is unfounded , and that it too essential employ indirect methods . The scientist admits to creating ` illustrations to convey the essence of his findings . The scientific expert example is in fact not very distinguishable from the spectral analogy , and both atomic number 18 employing s that are strictly applicable elsewhere , but utilize because of their power of speck . This essay is an attempt to analyze the similarities and differences between the 2 , with character to the views of Alister McGrath as expressed in Science and piety : An inlet , as well as those of Mircea Eliade , found in Myth and RealityMcGrath takes the strictly scientific approach . As a egress he analyses religious myth very mulishly as an extension to the scientific model Rutherford s of the pinch is a brilliant example of the scientific model . The constituents of the corpuscle cannot mayhap be seen Yet by the turn of the twentieth vitamin C a wealth of experimental data had accrued adjoin the atom and its constituents . To explain this data the scientists found themselves exercising the optic modality to greater degrees than usual , and a number of practical scenarios sprang up . Rutherford s model proved to be the most meaning(prenominal) , and has stood the test of snip . He imagined a nucleus at the centre of the atom comprising the protons and neutrons , and the electrons orbiting the nucleus in the manner in which the planets orbit the cheerfulness . Being the most intuitive simulacrum it aided the ! sight , and thus was a great incentive in the raise advance of atomic science . however at the fourth dimension many scientists realized that much(prenominal) an arrangement was untenable .

If electrons were allowed to circulate in the electric empyrean of the nucleus they were bound to last lose energy and transgress into the nucleus (Cayne 1981 ,. 387 . Then once more , the protons are very unlikely to reside to deposither in a closely jam-packed nucleus due to common repulsion . Despite these arouse objections the model stood with the scientific participation . This is only due to the kindle power to stimulate the imagination that the solar-system model for the atom held , and this is good word to the role that imagination plays in scientific reasoningA more intense example is the model used in the kinetic speculation of suckes In the seventeenth century the Englishman Robert Boyle had empirically determined that the constrict and volume of a suck are inversely proportionate to each other , as long as the temperature is unplowed unvarying A circumstantial later the Frenchman Jaques Charles showed that the volume of gas is proportional to the temperature , and long as the pressure is kept constant . Combining the two it is possible to arrive at the perfection gas equationpV kTHere...If you want to get a full essay, holy order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper