Calls for marijuana legalization

The debate on whether or not to legalize ganja trade and consumption has been ranging on for a long time with calls for its total ban equally as loud as those that fight for its legitimation. This debate a times bugger offs a religious and an emotional perspective. This paper seeks to strengthen with factual support, the calls that support its legalization. It forget give designers behind those views as nearly as analyze the fence sentiments. All this is in the believe that marijuana, if legalized, stands to be more(prenominal) beneficial to the indian lodge that the way it is today.My first argument towards legalization of marijuana go away take an economic perspective. Billions of tax payers cash is going to swash in the process of arresting and prosecuting tribe accused of consuming marijuana. This money should be channeled towards other important social functions like wellnessc are and providing education to our children (Barnett P.G 166-171).Every division in Ame rica, thousands of people are huddled in drug courts confront with all manner of charges ranging from consuming to trafficking marijuana, then handed undeserving sentences. regale requires millions of dollars. This is money that should be spent in giving counseling and interference to the affected rather than trying to catch the few of the majority that smokes. It is sheer that our money is surely going to waste the war against drugs has never been won and is not going to be won some(prenominal) time soon.The make up of maintaining prisoners arraigned in court over marijuana related cases each yr is estimated at 1.2 billion dollars ever year. This does not include the cost of investigating, arresting, a prosecuting and hundreds of thousands of marijuana users arrested every year (Wayne Hall 7) this to me is a waste of scarce resources, money that otherwise should not be used had we legalized marijuana.Still in economics, the marijuana is a multibillion industry that continues to place food on the table for millions of people world wide, illicitly of course. I this industry can operate legally it would be able to secure jobs to millions more as well as contributing billion of dollars through taxation. About 11 billion dollars would be gained from the tax. (Douglas Mc Ray58). The marketing of marijuana has its illegal model is left to blackened marketers this meaning that currently their proceeds go untaxed. scotch benefits of legalized marijuana entrust be two fold. First it allow for be from the funds saved from the efforts to curb and eradicate its use and then secondly benefits arising form its taxation. Marijuana should be legalized, either way whether legalized or illegal consumption still takes place. thither are no statistics available to call for that its continued legal crushing over by chance the last 30 years has had all nonessential impact. Prohibition does not decrease its use. Its popularity does not wane. Netherlands has done it. Its a good case study that marijuana legalization would not be the disaster that opponents say it would be (Douglas Mc Kay29-32)Debate still rages on realistic effects of legalizing marijuana on the health of the users. There are those who fence that it has ill effects on health while others argue that the general effects are insignificant. Without looking at the worst case scenarios and extenuation cases, both studies indicate that in that respect are no know risks associated with its overdose possible side effects can only be exhibited in the behaviors of the user. (Douglas Mc Kay) these results indicate that marijuana use is not more angry than alcohol consumption unlimitedly.Tobacco use is equally harmful and yet it is legal. The reason why marijuana remains illegal is due to its peeved adverse effects on the users. The government in its social responsibility social occasion has to limit its use/ ill-usage. This to me is based on flimsy grounds. Alcohol and baccy are as well as harmful, then why ban one poisonous substance and out rightly allow the usage of the other one. This is illegal.Marijuana decriminalization will allow people to explore the possible medicinal values it has. Studies entertain shown, according to Baker D.(2003 561-567),that cannnabinoids (contained in marijuana) provide a novel curative target, not only for controlling symptoms, but also slowing ailment progression through inhibition of neurodeneration. Disregarding its side effects, marijuana is hailed to confound many redress benefits like subsiding pain in pubic louse patients it is basically used with pain and muscle stiffness in patients.Criminalization of marijuana literally closes these windows of research. Doctors and health experts are barred from researching with it or administering on any of their patients despite indications that it can effectively be used for medical purpose with only some mile side effects. We are making it unaccessible to millions of people out there who are maybe suffering form cancer and would want some relieve.This country boasts of respect and exercising sound freedoms for all persons. Freedom of worship is a key right that should be named by all and is guaranteed by the constitution. Rastafaricinism, a dominant faith in Jamaica openly advocates for marijuana usage citing its religious importance. Criminalization of marijuana all the way is in contravention of people right not only to exercise their right of worship but also their basic right to excerpt as long these choices do not affect others negatively.I believe it should be left to the respective individuals to make an informed choice on whether realise or not. They should be left all to exercise the individual liberty. good deal to, are left alone to choose on whether to drink or smoke, despite their known harms, people too, I think should be given leeway over marijuana.As I had noted earlier, the proponents of marijuana criminalization are eq ually vocal and belief they have solid reasons as to why the status quo should remain. Marijuana just like most drug is known to induce addictive tendencies, this is where its continued use results to the user macrocosm hooked to it to an extent that they are unable to function normally without it. I must say however, that addiction is not limited to marijuana alone alcohol, tobacco and also other prescribed drugs are known to cause addddiction even of a higher degree than cannabis.There is also the argument that it legalization is tantamount to sending a message especialy to underage that its consumption is indeed good. It will remove the stigma currently associated with it making it attracitve to most persons. Although this patch contains some truth in it, legalization of cannabis in Netherlands failed to indicate this. Although there were a few new users, occassioned by its decriminalization, their numbers were not significantly high to warrant any concerns.Initial lifting of the ban would see maybe attraction of new users but this would later change as temperate k(1999,p49) says,..on the other hand,the disappearance of the forbidden fruits characteristics of marijuana would tend to lower consumption.This amnionic fluid down the argument that lifting the ban would see increased use.Marijuana too if allowed will lead to more expenses on the government to cope with its abuse. There will be increased allocations for the rehabs and medical facilities tao cope with its possible rampant usage. It would also mean more investments to cope with drug related crimes resulting from drug abuse. I must insist however, that findings doen do not ling marijuana to any violent crimes more than they do other drugs or specifically to alcohol. Also, a simple lsot benefit analysis refutes that the government stands to spend more on rehabs. By legalising it, any additional investment on rehabs is surpassed by the nest egg on marijuana policies and prosecutions in additional to the likely benefits emanating from taxes. (Aldrich, M. et al, 75-81).ConclusionThere is a look at to review the current laws banning marijuana use in total.It is more beneficial to the general society and particularly the government.The benefits gained through taxation and usance creation surpasses the negative effects of rehabilitating the abusers.In addition too are the millions of dollars the federal government would save.The resources used to fight marijuana through prosecutions,arrests and maintaining thousands in tuck in would be rechanelled to other vital sectors.The benefits outweigh the costs,this should be the sole logic behind its legalisation.More benefits too stand to be reaped through the possible advances do in the medicine sector.It will see more research be done to establish ways in which marijuana can be used to ease pain in cancer patients as well as other medicinal values being explored.Works CitedAidriach, M. and T. uikuriya. Savings in Carlifornia Mar ijuana law enforcement costsattributable to the Moscone Act of 1976. Journal of Psychoactive drugs 20, 1998.75-81. Appraisals of the adverse health effects of cannabis use Ideology andEvidence. June 1999.The FAS Drug policy analytic thinking Bulletin. Washington DC. Accessed on 3rd August 2007.https//fas.org/3>Baker D. Pryce G. The therapeutic Potential of cannabis in multiple sclerosis. Expertopinion on investigations drugs. 2003, 561-567.Barnett, P.G. The cost-effectiveness of substance abuse treatment. Current psychiatryreports. 1999. 166-171.Thornton, M. Prohibition US. Legalisation Do Economists reach a conclusion of drugpolicy? Ludwig Von Mises Institute 2002. pp.27Marijuana Legalisation the time is now. 1998. The psycheditic subroutine library home page.Clement K W Daryal M. The Economics of Marijuana Consumption.Crawley, Australia University of Western Australia Economic Research center.1999, p 49.indicate that marijuana resutls aviors of the user. ases, both studies ind icate that there are no known risks associated with it