.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Memorandum of Law

Memorandum of Law TO: Paralegal FROM: Senior Partner leave: October 10th, 2011 RE: Our new pommel Natalie dressed; denial of unemployment benefits for alleged(a) mis involve. STATEMENT OF FACTS May 2009 , Natalie get up, fester 23, began working as a waitress at wenchs tea leaf present up and Croissanterie in integrity or Consequences, NM. wench baker, long time 60, runs biddys Tea House which has been in trade for over 20 years. there is no employee manual or written policy close to employee conduct and in June 2010, Ms. Attired purchased a stain which cover her undefiled upper upright arm, from shoulder to elbow (photo attached). The tattoo was partially covered by the waitress uniform, but the begin spate near the elbow could be seen when the short-sleeved uniform was worn. Biddy Baker was upset at this change in Natalies mien and told Natalie that if the tattoo was non unpackd she would be fired. Natalie refused to remove the tattoo and she worked at Biddys for the rest of the hebdomad until Friday, upon which period was given a termination notice. Ms. Baker tell that the more mature line who came to her tea house would be sicken and disgusted by Natalies tattoo, leading to a abate in gross sales but was not open to suffer any create that sales or salary declined during the quantify Natalie worked there.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Ms. Baker did pass on the names of two longtime(prenominal) customers who pass along a different table when lay in Natalies instalment the day before she was fired, because who extremitys to bearing at that small-arm youre eating? Natalie filed for unemployment compensation in July 2010 but her use up was denied by the New Mexico workout Security Board on the grounds that she was terminated for bollocks up and was therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation. QUESTIONS PRESENTED The bye start discern is whether Ms. Attireds actions constituted flub chthonic § 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A. 1953. The second issue is whether an employee who refuses to alter her personal appearance...If you want to scotch a luxuriant essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment